Post by Lydia Morales on Mar 15, 2011 19:11:59 GMT -5
Hi guys, regardless on how you got here, you have to be congratulated on doing things that we couldn't so, well done.
My questions are based on a theme of 'perception' and how you guys are seen by the jury.
Wendy, I'll start with you.
Now, whilst you clearly played the most ruthless game out of everyone, it seems your strategical game has been hyped up just a bit. You certainly played very well, better then me, but, you don't seem to be this massive strategist you seem to portray yourself as. You merged up 6-4 with one and a half inactives. You had two idols in your direct control. You were aligned with a twosome of Liz and Aras that was pretty much unbreakable.
Don't get me wrong, its just, I would like to see how you played strategically some more.
Question: Name for me one or two times in this game where you made a strong strategical move (subtle or obvious) that some of us jury members are maybe not aware of.
Gabriel,
Now, I won't lie. In my confessional I stated there is no way in hell you would make the final two if you sided with Wendy. I stated that the round before I left. I was wrong. Very wrong. However.....let's not forget, you got here by some MAJOR luck.
Penny quitting, Cindy going inactive, Rudy announcing he had an idol, Aras and Liz sharing an IP address. I'm sorry, but, to dodge the bullet 4 times is just plain insanity.
So, your perceived game is very weak. However, you obviously aligned yourself with the right people at the right time. You said the things you needed to, you did and voted how you needed to....you played quite well....WHEN you played. It's just....you didn't play, that much,
Question: What did you say and do to worm yourself into that four way alliance of Liz/Aras/Wendy/You? The more detail you give the better your chances.
To both of you, good luck, with five jurors these questions will be critical. You cannot afford to ditch one or two peoples favor by negatively answering their question, so answer these well, and many of your past digressions may be ignored.
My questions are based on a theme of 'perception' and how you guys are seen by the jury.
Wendy, I'll start with you.
Now, whilst you clearly played the most ruthless game out of everyone, it seems your strategical game has been hyped up just a bit. You certainly played very well, better then me, but, you don't seem to be this massive strategist you seem to portray yourself as. You merged up 6-4 with one and a half inactives. You had two idols in your direct control. You were aligned with a twosome of Liz and Aras that was pretty much unbreakable.
Don't get me wrong, its just, I would like to see how you played strategically some more.
Question: Name for me one or two times in this game where you made a strong strategical move (subtle or obvious) that some of us jury members are maybe not aware of.
Gabriel,
Now, I won't lie. In my confessional I stated there is no way in hell you would make the final two if you sided with Wendy. I stated that the round before I left. I was wrong. Very wrong. However.....let's not forget, you got here by some MAJOR luck.
Penny quitting, Cindy going inactive, Rudy announcing he had an idol, Aras and Liz sharing an IP address. I'm sorry, but, to dodge the bullet 4 times is just plain insanity.
So, your perceived game is very weak. However, you obviously aligned yourself with the right people at the right time. You said the things you needed to, you did and voted how you needed to....you played quite well....WHEN you played. It's just....you didn't play, that much,
Question: What did you say and do to worm yourself into that four way alliance of Liz/Aras/Wendy/You? The more detail you give the better your chances.
To both of you, good luck, with five jurors these questions will be critical. You cannot afford to ditch one or two peoples favor by negatively answering their question, so answer these well, and many of your past digressions may be ignored.